But who will want a Renault 4?

The successful revival of the Renault 5 in a 100% electric version has sparked ideas for the diamond brand. But are they good or bad?

In 1956, Renault’s managing director, Pierre Dreyfus, challenged his engineers: “Make me a volume!” The guiding idea for the future Renault 4, or 4L as it is still affectionately called today, was launched. A versatile car offering a gigantic interior space, nearly cubic, thanks to a front-engine philosophy. The engine and gearbox located in front of the passengers to free up maximum living space.

66 years later, the idea of maximizing interior space is still relevant, and more than ever. So why not revive the 4L concept by taking full advantage of the endless interior layout possibilities offered by new electric powertrains? The Renault 4 E-Tech electric is just above the Renault 5 in terms of volume. Slightly larger than the latter, it positions itself as Captur compared to Clio. While the R5 targets a young, urban clientele, the Renault 4 aims to reach a broader audience, including young families.

A real Renault 4

On paper, it has good arguments with a generous trunk volume of 420 liters, unfortunately mostly upward. It also offers an exceptionally low loading sill, clever storage solutions, a fold-down bench, the option to flatten the passenger seat, etc… but nothing truly revolutionary. The 4L was revolutionary; this Renault 4 is not.

But there is mainly a serious problem with zeros. While the “real” Renault 4 was probably the cheapest of its time, or at least offered the best quality/price ratio in Europe, and perhaps in the world, the “new” Renault 4 will be pricey. Not overly expensive, but not cheaper than its competitors, and it’s uncertain whether its somewhat polarizing design gives it an advantage.

ALSO READ: Renault 4, great ideas but a soul of 4L?